以下是 AI 在国际贸易上的一些应用相关资料:
此外,英国在 AI 监管方面的国际策略包括:
同时,英国的 AI 监管框架强调协作、适度和适应性,以与国际方法充分对齐,最大化市场准入和商业机会,且形成反馈循环的重要部分,理解该制度的运行情况及如何迭代。
联合国教科文组织:《[面向教师的人工智能能力框架](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/OX5BrpGMg《[生成式AI与国际贸易分析](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/MTyQrsF29eHmJ6cxT4gcQTDYnkb)》是一份由世界经济论坛发布的白皮书,探讨了AI对国际贸易的影响。美国国际开发署(USAID):《[AI在全球发展中的PLAYBOOK](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/Oob6rtaicejGnocwdGYcD36Znyh)》艾瑞咨询:《[2024年中国移动互联网AIGC赛道流量报告](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/EGiHrkGvNeG1orcNfhIczclHn7g)》《[2024年营销人工智能报告](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/BG6WrwHWeegDS7c9ntwcILiPnTf)》(中英双语)华为:《[AR洞察与应用实践白皮书](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/PHt5r6QxGePZXTc1NXocnyU7nYc)》探讨了增强现实(AR)技术的现状、发展趋势和行业应用。全球产业组织圆桌会议(GIO):《[AI使能工业创新](https://waytoagi.feishu.cn/record/MJ5hrZWRseWQlJceJpVcMveDnVg)》
119.The UK will continue to pursue an inclusive,multi-stakeholder approach,from negotiating new global norms to helping partner countries build their awareness and capacity in relation to the benefits and risks of AI technology.We will,for example,support other nations to implement regulation and technical standards that support inclusive,responsible and sustainable artificial intelligence.More widely,the International Tech Strategy reiterates how we will shape global AI activities in line with UK values and priorities,protecting against efforts to adopt and apply AI technologies in the service of authoritarianism and repression.We will work with UK industry leaders to ensure that we stay at the forefront of AI and share our best practice with like-minded nations.Similarly,we will learn from our international partners,encouraging them to share lessons we can integrate into our framework.120.Our international approach will include ensuring that proven,effective,and agreed upon assurance techniques and international technical standards play a role in the wider regulatory ecosystem.Such measures will also support cross-border trade by setting out risk management and AI governance practices that are globally recognised by trading partners,reducing technical164 Global AI Index,Tortoise Media,2022;AI rankings by country,AI Rankings,2023.68A pro-innovation approach to AI regulationbarriers to trade and increasing market access.We will also use our world-leading innovation provisions in Free Trade Agreements to address the challenges innovators in AI may face and ensure that businesses are able to take advantage of the opportunities it presents.121.In multilateral engagements,we will work to leverage each forum’s strengths,expertise and membership to ensure they are adding maximum value to global AI governance discussions and are relevant to our democratic values and economic priorities.Box 6.1:Examples of international engagement and collaboration
•Collaborative:by fostering close cooperation with international partners.•Proportionate:by making sure the framework is sufficiently aligned with international approaches to maximise market access and business opportunities without imposing unnecessary burdens that could stifle innovation or otherwise negatively impact on international trade and/or investment in AI in the UK.•Adaptable:as it forms an important part of the feedback loop to understand how well the regime is functioning and how it should iterate.Consultation questions:1.9.Do you agree that the functions outlined in Box 3.1 would benefit our AI regulationframework if delivered centrally?1.10.What,if anything,is missing from the central functions?2.11.Do you know of any existing organisations who should deliver one or more of our proposed central functions?3.12.Are there additional activities that would help businesses confidently innovate anduse AI technologies?12.1.If so,should these activities be delivered by government,regulators or a differentorganisation?1.13.Are there additional activities that would help individuals and consumers confidentlyuse AI technologies?13.1.If so,should these activities be delivered by government,regulators or a different organisation?1.14.How can we avoid overlapping,duplicative or contradictory guidance on AI issued by different regulators?Box 3.2 Supporting coherence in risk assessmentWhy?Many AI risks do not fall neatly into the remit of one individual regulator and they could go unaddressed if not monitored at a cross-sector level.A central,cross-economy risk function will also enable government to monitor future risks in a rigorous,coherent and49A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation