WaytoAGI 和 ChatGPT 有以下一些区别:WaytoAGI 网站提供了和 AI 知识库对话、集合精选的 AI 网站、集合精选的提示词、呈现知识库精选等功能。而 ChatGPT 主要是一个语言模型,用于生成自然语言文本。
需要注意的是,这些区别只是基于所提供的内容进行的总结,实际情况可能更加复杂和多样化。
Compare[this short and scattered effort](https://chat.openai.com/share/82b429e2-efb1-403c-a4a8-2d8eea1b9c4a)(which I’d likely give a D- or F)to this[pretty decent attempt](https://chat.openai.com/share/65bf7af7-5672-4ecc-b553-2d3d32573483),which would get around a B+.The difference is the use of roleplaying.In the latter,I tell ChatGPT that it is “an advanced language model that has been trained on prize-winning graduate and undergraduate essays.” I also ask it to start with self-reflection and an outline(which is basically replicating the process a real person would take).As students get better at finessing prompts in this way,cheating on take-home writing assignments will get far easier.But this same power of asking LLMs to role-play as specialized versions of themselves also makes them hugely interesting as educational tools in the classroom — and,specifically,as history simulators.
In the second half of this post,I go into detail about what exactly I mean by “simulating history.” I am under no illusions that these simulations are accurate:they are littered with confidently-stated falsehoods and hallucinations.Sometimes,though,hallucinations can be a feature,not a bug.At the end of this post,I include links to detailed prompts which you can use to simulate different historical settings,or customize to use with[Claude](https://claude.ai/chats)or[ChatGPT](https://openai.com/chatgpt)(the free versions of both work about equally well,though GPT-4 works best).I invite readers to share their experiences in the comments.
欢迎来到[WaytoAGI网站](https://www.waytoagi.com/),我们提供以下一些功能的使用:和AI知识库对话:你可以在这里问任何关于AI的问题AI网站:集合了精选的AI网站,按需求找到适合你的工具AI提示词:集合了精选的提示词,可以复制到AI对话网站来使用知识库精选:将每天知识库的精华内容呈现给大家。总之,WaytoAGI网站和WaytoAGI知识库是各自独立的,但有相互关联,是希望成为你学习AI路上的好助手。类似问题:waytoagi网站可以做什么?这个网站有什么用?