在法律领域，当优先考虑的风险处于法律空白地带时，监管机构需要与政府合作以确定潜在行动。例如，在法律服务部门，只有六种特定的法律服务活动受到监管机构的监督，这些“保留法律服务活动”在 2007 年《法律服务法》（HM Government）中有明确规定，且只能由获得授权（或豁免）的人员进行。AI 驱动的系统可能会提供诸如撰写遗嘱或合同等其他服务（许多人可能认为这属于法律服务），但却不受法律服务监管机构的监督。对于 AI 监管，应采取创新的方法，例如调整监管机构的职权范围、更新监管机构的法规，或者进行额外的立法干预。我们的方法得益于强大的主权议会制度，能够可靠地针对新兴问题引入有针对性和适度的措施，包括在必要时调整现有立法。
with government to identify potential actions.This may include identifying iterations to theFor example,there are only six specific legal services activities that are overseen by regulators in the legal services sector.These “reserved legal activities” are set out in the Legal Services Act,HM Government,2007 and can only be carried out bythose who are authorised(or exempt).AI-driven systems could offer other services like writing wills or contracts(which manymight consider to be legal services)without being subject to oversight from legal services regulators.A pro-innovation approach to AI regulationframework such as changes to regulators’ remits,updates to the Regulators’Code,111oradditional legislative interventions.Our approach benefits from our strong sovereignparliamentary system,which reliably allows for the introduction of targeted and proportionatemeasures in response to emerging issues,including by adapting existing legislation ifnecessary.112