以下是关于对 AI 祛魅的相关内容：
可以直接抠图，也可以安装PS里的进行操作：图片上传即可抠图，可以用于做一些素材，在用素材辅助做一些氛围动画。如叶子飘落，战斗时石头等素材[media2.mp4](https://bytedance.feishu.cn/space/api/box/stream/download/all/F4lpbVDMtoyDIDxj233cAXzpn6e?allow_redirect=1)[heading2]2.9声音素材[content]背景音乐Aive尝试制作背景音乐。但是由于需要一些乐理知识，对于我们来说有点困难，于是其中一名团队成员想着可以用下方的工具，生成差不多背景音乐，这个还会有版权使用许可证。为了在紧张刺激的场景画面时体现激烈的氛围，需要在音乐中加上鼓点，但高潮部分音乐又要足够气势磅礴，使得整体的画面和节奏相互协调。我们发现大部分的AI音乐难以达到我们的要求。于是我们利用了一款分离人声的AI软件，它能够将人声从背景音乐中分离出来。并且对一些游戏宣传的音乐进行了人声去除和剪辑处理。尽管这个项目只是借用了人工智能的概念，但实际上也应用了一些简单的技术，目前的音乐是一种无版权的剪辑形式。旁白微软AI语音：制作使用了微软声音库制作旁白，语音库支持147种语言，相对而言选择就会多一些，除了语音库，还有定制声音。（也可以根据你的声调跟节奏来制作旁白）[媒体8.mp4](https://bytedance.feishu.cn/space/api/box/stream/download/all/IPSKbhwOloeMsIxAQjVcRD0wnWb?allow_redirect=1)
为了回应你的答案，AI很容易“产生幻觉”并生成看似合理的事实。它可以生成完全错误的内容，而且非常令人信服。让我强调一下：AI连续且良好地撒谎。它告诉你的每一件事或信息可能都是不正确的。你需要检查所有的东西。你需要全部检查一下。特别危险的是要求它为互联网提供参考、引用、引文和信息（对于未连接到互联网的模型）。因为GPT-4通常更加扎实，因为Bing的互联网连接意味着它实际上可以拉入相关事实。[这是一份避免幻觉的指南](https://oneusefulthing.substack.com/p/how-to-get-an-ai-to-lie-to-you-in)，但它们不可能完全消除。另请注意，人工智能不会解释自己，它只会让你认为它解释了自己。如果你要求它解释它为什么写东西，它会给你一个完全编造的合理答案。当你询问它的思考过程时，它并没有审查自己的行动，它只是生成听起来像它在做这样的文本。这使得理解系统中的偏见非常困难，尽管这些偏见几乎肯定存在。它也可以被不道德地用来操纵或作弊。你对这些工具的输出负责。
These two powerful opposing forces,the pervasive expectation of writing and the irreducible difficulty of doing it,create enormous pressure.This is why eminent professors often turn out to have resorted to plagiarism.The most striking thing to me about these cases is the pettiness of the thefts.The stuff they steal is usually the most mundane boilerplate — the sort of thing that anyone who was even halfway decent at writing could turn out with no effort at all.Which means they're not even halfway decent at writing.Till recently there was no convenient escape valve for the pressure created by these opposing forces.You could pay someone to write for you,like JFK,or plagiarize,like MLK,but if you couldn't buy or steal words,you had to write them yourself.And as a result nearly everyone who was expected to write had to learn how.Not anymore.AI has blown this world open.Almost all pressure to write has dissipated.You can have AI do it for you,both in school and at work.The result will be a world divided into writes and write-nots.There will still be some people who can write.Some of us like it.But the middle ground between those who are good at writing and those who can't write at all will disappear.Instead of good writers,ok writers,and people who can't write,there will just be good writers and people who can't write.Is that so bad?Isn't it common for skills to disappear when technology makes them obsolete?There aren't many blacksmiths left,and it doesn't seem to be a problem.Yes,it's bad.The reason is something I mentioned earlier:writing is thinking.In fact there's a kind of thinking that can only be done by writing.You can't make this point better than Leslie Lamport did:If you're thinking without writing,you only think you're thinking.